Advanced Research Review is committed to maintaining an appropriate standard of academic quality through a systematic and transparent peer-review process. The purpose of peer review is to evaluate the originality, relevance, methodological soundness, clarity, and scholarly contribution of submitted manuscripts. The journal aims to ensure that publication decisions are based on academic merit and compliance with its editorial requirements.
- Submitted manuscripts are checked for relevance to the journal’s scope, originality, completeness and compliance with author guidelines.
- Suitable manuscripts are assessed by qualified reviewers with relevant subject expertise.
- Reviewers assess originality, research significance, methodological rigour, quality of analysis, ethical compliance and validity of conclusions.
- Based on reviewers’ reports and editorial assessment, manuscripts may be accepted, returned for revision or rejected. Final decisions are made by the authorised editor.
- Editors and reviewers must maintain manuscript confidentiality and disclose conflicts of interest. Reviewers should decline assignments when they cannot provide an impartial assessment. Appropriate review records should be maintained.